Sunday, February 26, 2012

Do bike paths promote bike riding in America?

The "fundamental law of road congestion" tells us that building roads creates traffic. There's such a latent demand for space on the highway that no sooner does it appear than it's filled. But whether or not a similar law applies to bike paths and bike lanes remains a mystery. A recent study of Seattle residents found that those living near bike paths had an increased likelihood of riding, but saw no effect for bike lanes. Then again, a study in Minneapolis reached the opposite conclusion. Some recent work has found no connection between bike lanes and ridership levels at all. In short, the research picture is far from settled. A new study published in the March 2012 issue of the journal Transportation attempts to clarify the confusion. Ralph Buehler of Virginia Tech and John Pucher of Rutgers analyzed a new batch of 2008 data on bike lanes (that is, on-road routes) and bike paths (off-road ones) in 90 of the largest cities in America. Even after controlling for a number of factors — including land use, climate, socioeconomic status, gas prices, public transport and bike safety — they still get a clear result: "cities with a greater supply of bike paths and lanes have significantly higher bike commute rates." Read on in Atlantic Cities

1 comment:

Alex said...

I think bike paths/lanes have something to do with people riding, although I don't think it's so straightforward. For me, for example, I have a really long commute - longer than I could possibly ride, with bike paths or without, so what made the difference was getting a folding bike so that I could still drive until I was close enough to ride my bike in. Bike lanes and paths help, but they're certainly not the only factor.